IBC ToteMarketEST. 2009
Wash line · 26 September 2023 · 8 min read

The Oil Residue Nobody Wants to Talk About

✿ Quote ticket — routed to a live graderYard details

Reading this because you are specifying, buying or selling containers? Send the details and a grader answers in writing, usually the same business day.

Who you are
Letters only
Letters only
A working address — we reply in writing
US or Canada, 10 digits — e.g. (314) 884-0192
Optional
Where it is going
Optional
Two-letter code, e.g. MO or ON
US ZIP (63132) or Canadian (M5V 2T6)
What you need
Pick one or describe it
What you need us to do
Optional — leave blank and we will advise
Whole units
Optional, but the more detail the tighter the quote

required. Phone and postal code are checked against real US and Canadian formats — a mistyped one is refused rather than silently lost.

Yusuf BaranWash-line supervisor
washingcausticresidue
Short answer

Oil saponifies rather than dissolves, and the reaction rate collapses below about 160 °F. The same caustic at ambient temperature is roughly a tenth as effective, which is why a hose, a brush and a bag of soda crystals will not clean an oil tote however long you spend on it.

Most yards in this trade will not take oil totes. They will say the market is soft, or that they are full, and what they mean is that an oil residue is a forty-minute cycle on a line built for twelve-minute cycles, and the economics do not work unless you have built for it.

We built for it, badly at first. This is what we learned.

Why oil is different

Syrup, juice, brine and glycol are soluble. Put them in hot water with agitation and they leave. The cleaning problem is mechanical: get the water to touch every surface.

Oil is not soluble in water and never will be. To remove it you have to chemically convert it into something that is — specifically, you saponify it: react the triglyceride with a strong alkali to produce a soap and glycerol, both of which dissolve. You are not washing the oil out. You are turning it into soap and then washing the soap out.

That changes everything about the cycle, because a chemical reaction has a rate, and a rate has a temperature dependence.

Temperature beats concentration

This was our expensive early lesson. Faced with oil residue that would not shift, the instinct is to add caustic. More sodium hydroxide, stronger solution, surely faster.

It barely helps. Saponification rate is far more sensitive to temperature than to alkali concentration over the range a wash line can work in. Our own cycle data, roughly:

Relative oil removal at constant 2% NaOH
Solution temperatureRelative removal ratePractical cycle time
Ambient, about 70 °F1×Does not complete
120 °F3×Over 3 hours, incomplete
150 °F7×About 70 minutes
165 °F10×About 40 minutes
180 °F13×About 30 minutes

So the useful answer is not more caustic. It is enough caustic, held hot, recirculating, for long enough. We run oil cycles at 2 to 2.5% sodium hydroxide at 165 to 180 °F for 30 to 40 minutes with a surfactant assist, against 12 to 15 minutes at 1.5% for a syrup tote.

This is also why a domestic attempt fails. You can buy caustic and you can buy a long brush. You cannot easily recirculate 180 °F liquid through a 275 gallon vessel for forty minutes, and that is the active ingredient.

What the surfactant is for

Saponification works on the oil the solution can reach. A thick oil film resists wetting — the solution beads off it rather than sitting on it. A small surfactant dose drops the surface tension so the caustic actually contacts the film, which shortens the cycle by roughly a third.

It also creates a second problem. Soap plus surfactant plus agitation makes foam, and foam in a recirculating loop is genuinely difficult: it fills the headspace, carries over into the separator and ruins the oil-water split you need for the loop to work at all. We lost a separator charge learning that.

The separator is the part that matters

An oil cycle produces a loop charge loaded with soap, glycerol and emulsified oil. Dump it and you have used a full caustic charge on four totes, which is uneconomic and environmentally pointless.

Our three-stage separator pulls solids first, then floats off the free oil fraction, then polishes through carbon. The oil fraction goes to a used-oil reclaimer for energy recovery. Done properly, an oil charge washes dozens of units before it is spent, and spent charge is neutralised and discharged under permit.

Make-up water across the whole line runs under 9 gallons per tote against an industry single-pass typical of 40-plus. Oil cycles pull that average up, and they are still nowhere near a hose.

What cannot be saved

  • Cured resin, polyurethane and epoxy. Chemically bonded to the wall. No cycle touches it. Rebottle or regrind.
  • Drying oils that have polymerised in place — a tote left half full of linseed for two years is a solid problem, not a chemical one.
  • Any oil tote going to food service where the prior content is not documented as edible. Clean is not the same as certified.
  • A bottle whose lower corners are already crazed. We are not going to spend forty minutes of line time on a vessel that will weep next spring.

What it costs, and why we charge more for it

An oil cycle is $58 against $28 for syrup or brine. That is not a margin decision — it is three times the line time, more caustic, more heat, more separator load and an oil fraction to place. If somebody quotes you the same price for both, ask what their oil cycle actually is.


806 words · published 26 September 2023 by Yusuf Baran, Wash-line supervisor at IBC Tote Market LLC. We correct posts rather than quietly deleting them; if something here is wrong, tell us and we will say what changed.

Next step

Got a question this did not answer?

A grader reads every submission. Describe the problem rather than the product and you will get a real answer in writing.