IBC ToteMarketEST. 2009
From the grading pad · 5 August 2025 · 6 min read

Aquaponics Enquiries: Why We Say No More Often Than Yes

✿ Quote ticket — routed to a live graderYard details

Reading this because you are specifying, buying or selling containers? Send the details and a grader answers in writing, usually the same business day.

Who you are
Letters only
Letters only
A working address — we reply in writing
US or Canada, 10 digits — e.g. (314) 884-0192
Optional
Where it is going
Optional
Two-letter code, e.g. MO or ON
US ZIP (63132) or Canadian (M5V 2T6)
What you need
Pick one or describe it
What you need us to do
Optional — leave blank and we will advise
Whole units
Optional, but the more detail the tighter the quote

required. Phone and postal code are checked against real US and Canadian formats — a mistyped one is refused rather than silently lost.

Dale PrichardSenior grader
aquaponicsgradesrefusals
Short answer

A stocked aquatic system is the least forgiving application for a reused bottle, because fish respond to surfactant residues at parts-per-million and HDPE releases absorbed residue over months. We quote documented food grade or rebottled only, and lose roughly half of those enquiries.

Aquaponics enquiries come in waves, mostly February to May. They are among my favourite emails to receive and among the least satisfying to answer, because about two thirds of them ask for the cheapest tote on the yard and the answer has to be no.

What the enquiry usually says

A version of: "I'm building a small aquaponics system, I need two 275 gallon totes, what's your cheapest option?"

Entirely reasonable question. The person is building a first system, the budget is their own, and the internet is full of builds using whatever tote was available. Our cheapest option is technical grade at $95 to $145 and it is physically identical in every respect a reasonable person would check.

Why the answer is no

High-density polyethylene is semi-permeable. Over months in service, molecules from the stored product diffuse into the polymer wall. A wash cleans the surface; it cannot reach the bulk. Then, slowly, the wall releases what it absorbed back into whatever is in the tank now.

Fish respond to surfactant residues at parts-per-million concentrations — gill function and the mucus layer are directly affected. And the release happens over weeks to months, not hours.

So the failure sequence runs: fill, cycle for five weeks, stock, plant, succeed for a month, then lose the stock in week six while every water test you can run comes back normal. By then nobody suspects the tank. They suspect the feed, the pump, the weather, themselves.

A container that killed fish on day two would be a cheap lesson. One that does it in week six is not.

What we quote instead

What we will and will not quote for a stocked system
OptionPriceOur position
Technical grade$95 – $145Declined for stocked systems
Grade A, non-food prior content$155 – $225Declined for stocked systems
Grade A, documented edible prior content= food gradeYes
Food grade, with wash certificate$225 – $340Yes — our usual recommendation
Rebottled, new virgin bladder$340 – $430Yes — when food-grade stock is short

So the honest quote on a two-tote system is around $560 for food grade rather than around $240 for technical. That is a real difference to somebody building in their own garden, and I understand why it lands badly.

What it costs us

Roughly half of those enquiries go elsewhere. Somebody will sell a technical-grade tote to anyone who asks, and from the buyer's point of view they are getting the same object for 40% of the price from a seller who did not lecture them.

We are not claiming virtue here. We decline these partly because it is the right answer and partly because the complaint, if it comes, is unanswerable: the customer did everything right, the tote was as described, and the system died anyway.

The one case where we say yes to technical grade

Hydroponics with no fish, no edible crop surface contact, and a recirculating nutrient solution that gets dumped and replaced on a schedule.

Plants in a flowing nutrient solution are far more tolerant than fish in a closed water column, and a solution that is replaced every few weeks never reaches equilibrium with the wall. If you are running lettuce in NFT channels with a technical-grade reservoir that gets emptied monthly, that is a defensible build and we will quote it.

Add fish, or grow something whose edible part sits in the water, and we are back to food grade.

How to spend less without taking the risk

Three legitimate routes, in order of how much they save.

  1. Use a technical-grade tote for the sump or the header tank and a food-grade one for the fish tank. The sump is in the water circuit, so this only works if it is in series with a large food-grade volume and the solution turns over — ask us, it depends on the build.
  2. Buy one food-grade tote and make your media bed from a cage-only frame with a liner. The grow bed does not need a bottle at all, and a cage planter frame is $35 to $60.
  3. Ask for staining. A heavily dye-stained food-grade unit is at the bottom of the band — $225 rather than $340 — and the staining is purely cosmetic. It will be pink. The fish do not mind.

That third one is the most useful and the least obvious. Cosmetic condition within a grade carries a real price spread and no functional difference.


780 words · published 5 August 2025 by Dale Prichard, Senior grader at IBC Tote Market LLC. We correct posts rather than quietly deleting them; if something here is wrong, tell us and we will say what changed.

Next step

Got a question this did not answer?

A grader reads every submission. Describe the problem rather than the product and you will get a real answer in writing.